When I taught at UCLA I got to know
a psychiatrist, Maurice N. Walsh, MD (1905-1991) who was in the Neuropsychiatric
Institute. He developed an interest in psychiatry and war
when he was a medical resident at the Mayo Clinic and was asked to see a
patient. It was Rafael Trujillo, the
Dominican dictator who had syphilis but who also was psychotic. Soon WWII broke out and Walsh found himself
in the Pacific helping pilots to carry out missions to bomb Japan with a high
probability of crashing at sea before they could return to their base. At the war’s end he was asked to examine Rudolph
Hess for the Nuremberg trials. He found
Hess to be psychotic and his report was stamped secret and not allowed to be
used in the trials. Walsh wondered why
it was that highly narcissistic persons who might be classified as
megalomaniacs had such an appeal to the public and why they rose to power as
dictators. He became an advocate for the
scientific (rather than political or economic) study of war. He edited a book (1971) War and the Human Race gathering dozens of articles on medical, psychiatric,
anthropological, biological, and other approaches to the study of war.
Every
time I listen to one of Donald Trump’s interviews or speeches, I think of Maurice
Walsh. He said of Trujillo or Hess, why
is it that if we heard this person on a soapbox we walk away and consider this
person a nutcase but if he ran for office we would treat him as a serious
candidate? But Walsh also asked another
question: Why are so many people charmed or attracted by these narcissistic personalities? He argued that they appeal to people who are
tired of nuance, complexity, inconsistency, compromise, and failure in the political
world in which they live. The narcissistic
leader is decisive, admits no wrong, is good at fault-finding in others, and is
willing to take the risks to set things right that is part of our own wish
fulfillment.
I wish
some of our political commentators on TV news shows would call attention to the
striking similarity of Trump’s rhetoric and those of past bullying dictators
like Hitler and Mussolini and Trujillo.
Those with a dictatorial personality like to preach macho values of war
or the threat of war instead of diplomacy.
They disregard legalities in favor of executive authority as their first
choice for governing. They have overblown confidence in their intelligence or
knowledge of how the world works. The dictatorial
personality likes to give orders, likes to be surrounded by “yes men,” looks at
criticism as a form of treason or lack of patriotism, and likes to have others fight
their wars which are rarely responses to massive attacks or declarations of war.
I regret
the disappearance of psychological and psychiatric research on war, aggression,
and the narcissistic personality. In mid
20th century there were books like Erich Fromm’s Escape from Freedom and Carlo Levi’s Fear of Freedom. In the last half of the 20th
century, I believe, the wrong approach was used, stressing evolutionary models of
innate aggression or human nature making war seem inevitable because it is
fixed in our genes. I doubt that. War is a disease of society. Diseases can be prevented
but we need to do research that is not stuck in the traditional economic, political,
and human nature arguments for its causes.
Those have not worked in the past and a fresh look is much needed.
No comments:
Post a Comment