Thursday, July 2, 2015

UNDERSTANDING LIFE FROM MOLECULES TO ECOSYSTEMS



              Before the twentieth century, if you asked a biologist what life was, you might have gotten several answers.  Some biologists believed that is something only God could answer because he created life and no science would be able to duplicate this.  Life, for those scientists, involved vitalism in which a non-material essence, soul, or spirit-like supernatural component was introduced to make living matter.  Most biologists in the 1890s would have rejected this.  They would argue that the organisms we see on earth, plant and animal, are composed of cells and that cells contain a nucleus with chromosomes and a surrounding cytoplasm that contained organelles.  They would argue that studying the cell’s organelles would reveal a lot about how life worked. They would also argue that events in the nucleus suggest a mechanism for cell division and for the formation of reproductive cells—sperm and eggs.

               In the first half of the twentieth century biologists studying heredity identified genes as units of   inheritance found in chromosomes in the nuclei of cells and mapped them.  They knew some of the properties of genes and the mutation process.  What they did not know was the way genes functioned at a biochemical or molecular level nor did they know the chemical composition of genes and chromosomes.  That changed in the last half of the twentieth century.  Genes were shown to be composed of nucleic acids, especially DNA in chromosomal genes.  They worked out the structure of DNA and worked out the way nucleotide sequences in DNA specified corresponding sequences of nucleotides in RNA and in the proteins that the genes made.  The making of proteins took place in organelles of the cytoplasm.  Science became very specialized for biochemists and molecular biologists so most of the public has little understanding of how genes work. 

              But understanding molecular genetics was not enough.  Additional findings showed how genes were turned on or off.  They showed how RNA could enhance or diminish the activity of genes.  They showed there was a category of genes that led to body plan symmetry or to the shape and location of organs.  In addition to DNA activity governed by these genes and by mutations, there were RNA molecules that enhanced or diminished the activity of genes.  New fields of epigenetics and genomics opened as the century came to an end. For epigenetics genes could be silenced or activated by coating genes with methyl groups.  This was often reversible.  As the twenty first century began, epigenetics was supplemented with a variety of small RNA molecules acting as regulators of gene activity especially for timing when genes go on or off in the cell and how much product a given gene puts out. The genomics started in the late twentieth century has created evolutionary histories of the complete sequence of all genes in a species and comparative genomics allows biologists to study evolution at a molecular level. 

              What is not known is the composition, organization, and function of the cytoplasm and nuclear fluid that are not associated with membranous organelles in the cells. In the nineteenth century this would be called protoplasm.  How it works and how it differs from species to species is not yet worked out.  In all likelihood it will be worked out first in bacteria which have very few cellular organelles. The history of biology has been a retreat for vitalists who moved from the whole organism, to the organs, to the cells, and to the organelles as the bastions of vitalistic life.  They are now embedded in the non-organelle protoplasm hoping science will not work out the complex and dynamic system that surrounds the organelles and which is essential for the functioning of these cellular components.  If you are a holist but not a vitalist, you will accept a material basis for protoplasm but you will argue the complexity of life is beyond human capacity for analysis.  If you are a reductionist you will believe it is a matter of time, very likely in this century, when this last bastion of ignorance will fall.

              

No comments:

Post a Comment