Friday, July 3, 2015

WHY DO THOSE WHO BARELY GET BY BELIEVE RIGHT WING LIES?


Here are seven lies told by right wing candidates which are frequently accepted as truths by those whose lives are barely beyond poverty.

1.       There are makers and takers. In this version the makers are hard working people who live by the work ethic and create jobs. The takers are those who get subsidies like welfare, food stamps, aid to dependent children, those on disability benefits, and those getting “free” health care or social security.  All such benefits have been labeled by the far right as demeaning to those who work for every penny they earn. Mitt Romney used this in his campaign.

2.       The poor have themselves to blame.  According to this view the middle class and wealthy have worked hard and sacrificed to reach their status.  The poor are lazy, waste their money on alcohol and other vices, don’t do well in school because they don’t care, and they only live for the moment and don’t save and don’t plan the way successful people do.  This was commonly used by the eugenics movement of the 1910-1940 era citing families like the Jukes or the Tribe of Ishmael as examples that should be sterilized to prevent spreading “the unfit.”

3.       Recipients of welfare or other benefits from the government are cheats. President Reagan used the “welfare queen” as one of his campaign themes and I still hear people use it. They claim that cheats apply to every program available and then drive around in Cadillacs. 

4.       The myth of the self made man.  There is a romantic view of the rugged individualist.  He is the hero of Horatio Alger stories.  He is a Teddy Roosevelt type of outdoors, gun-loving, God-fearing man who takes no hand outs and meets every set back through hard work.  Roosevelt, of course, was not a “rags to riches” person. Unfortunately many self proclaimed self-made men are like the character Bounderby in Charles Dickens’s novel Hard Times,  who brag of their struggles but are phonies using fake stories to keep workers from protesting about low wages and poor work conditions.

5.       Libertarianism in the Ayn Rand version condemns all other forms of capitalism as corruptions. Ayn Rand advocated a laissez faire capitalism very different from that of Adam Smith who was a moral philosopher and who never believed in exploiting workers.  Rand’s libertarianism was a “winner takes all” system with winners (hard workers with ideas) and losers (shiftless masses and conformists with no incentive to better themselves). For Ayn Rand types, any deviation from her Libertarianism is socialism or communism.  That smear has been used against labor unions and any federal program attempting to help those who are victims of hard times or just being unlucky because they were born in slums or economically deprived neighborhoods.

6.       Trickle down economics is the only way to spread wealth.  This argument is trotted out by billionaires and millionaires claiming any money used to subsidize the poor or middle class leaves little money to trickle down to the poor in the form of new jobs.  Conveniently omitted are the hiding of their wealth in foreign banks which of course prevents any trickling down from that stash of wealth. Also omitted are the never refused subsidies to the rich in the form of depletion allowances, start up exemptions from taxation, and tax cuts largely benefitting the wealthy and rarely the poor.

7.       Giving employees raises is a job killer. Except of course to the top management where it is applauded. Have you heard any billionaires and millionaires applauding Henry Ford for giving a hefty salary to his factory workers so they could afford to buy his cars?  Ford adopted that outlook because rather than making a few cars for fellow rich cronies, he made millions of cars so virtually everyone could buy a family car. I’d call that a “trickle up” economic philosophy and it worked far better than his contemporary competitors who felt they would go out of business if Ford paid his workers so generously.

These seven lies will be repeated at every election campaign.  Why do those who most could benefit from a government that served their interests believe that a government that allows Ayn Rand type economics is what they should support?  I am talking about working class people who believe unions (not their bosses) are the takers.  Why do so many blue collar workers think criticism of the people who are cheating them or exploiting them is communist propaganda?  Some may feel that they have no hope of ever getting out of their lower class status and resent those who do, such as unionized workers. Some may be told that it is not this life that is important but an afterlife in Heaven that counts so they consider this their cross to bear.  Rarely do you hear churches that support the status quo question the double standard of the wealthy.  Let us hope Pope Francis has more luck in raising concern for the injustices done to those struggling to get by. 

The next time you hear one of these seven lies, send that person a copy of this.



No comments:

Post a Comment